Stable long-running quantum experiments as art installation
New technologies have made possible to build integrated experiment systems for cutting edge research.
We can bring the same kind of systems to the masses by making them more compact, more robust and more affordable. Imagine having a trapped atom quantum computer in your living room, not only looking very sci-fi, but can truly be experimented on if so desired.
It is an ambitious but possible goal, achievable with design and innovations like the new technology we are patenting.
Desk toy, luxury decorative piece and large scale exhibit
Currently, we are building a prototype for the new center for quantum precision measurement here at Caltech - cavity enhanced scanning fluorescence spectroscopy.
Many of the concepts demonstrated with our installation are useful in understanding both works done here at Hutzler lab and LIGO. Thus I want to argue that our demo/exhibit is a great fit for the new center for quantum precision measurement.
For more details, see the following proposal/summary.
Proposal for a cavity enhanced scanning fluorescence spectroscopy demonstration
by Yi Zeng, Spiros Michalakis and Nick Hutzler
The background science story
A cavity is a fundamental tool for experiments involving lasers. In the most basic sense, cavity is just two opposing mirrors where light can reflect back and forth between them. The laser power can build up by circulating between the mirrors if they are well aligned, typically also accompanied by tuning the cavity length to a multiple of the laser wavelength, a condition called resonance, which is a very important concept in quantum experiments as we will see later.
We use cavities in many situations, like for monitoring and controlling laser frequencies, as well as for laser power buildup to enhance interactions with molecules. Cavities are also very important for LIGO where laser power is crucial. They use what they call power recycling mirrors in a configuration called Fabry-Perot cavity to enhance their laser power from 50 Watts to 750,000 Watts.
Of course, to achieve such high amplification, extreme fine tuning and environmental control are needed. In fact, most resonant cavities require fine tuning, protection, and active feedback control systems. Thus, for our installation, we should use our non-resonant cavity to amplify our laser power - an instrument we recently developed in our laboratory. We recently published a paper about the design, and are applying for a patent. Our cavity can increase laser power by more than 100 times, without needing active feedback. Most importantly, it’s also very robust against perturbation; We have one as a toy in our office, on a desk which people constantly bump into, and yet it runs stably with no issue.
Spectroscopy is a precise way to study interactions between matter and waves by analyzing the frequency of the wave. In the context of atomic/molecular spectroscopy, we study the exact quantum structure of the atoms, molecules or even their constituent sub-particles by using electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies, like lasers and microwaves, to interact with them. In the context of LIGO, we study the properties of merging celestial bodies by studying the frequencies of the gravitational waves they generated. Also, spectroscopy is a general tool we use in almost every step of the way, from studying the properties of novel molecules to manipulating them using lasers. Same goes to LIGO as well, they use spectroscopy to learn about their optics elements, analyze noise signatures and many others.
Specifically, scanning fluorescence spectroscopy is when we use a laser of varying frequencies to interact with particles and monitor the light emitted by the particles. When the laser frequency matches the energy difference between two quantum states of the particle, a resonant condition is met and it excites the particle from the lower state to the higher state. Then, due to interactions with the fluctuating quantum vacuum, the particle will quickly drop back down by spontaneous emission, a process only explainable in quantum field theory. We detect the photon emitted in the process as a signal showing that our laser is on resonance, and we can calculate the energy difference between the two quantum states based on the laser frequency at that moment.
One can argue that frequency is the most fundamental measurement, which is counting the number of occurrences in a time duration. No measurement is more precise than frequency. That’s why modern SI units are mostly defined by frequency, and why it’s often a good strategy to convert quantities from lengths to voltages to frequencies. In the Nobel lecture: passion for precision, Theodor Hänsch quoted his mentor Arthur Schawlow, also a Nobel laureate, “Never measure anything but frequency!”
Once your measurement precision can reach an extreme degree, interestingly, you can start to explore the most extreme high energy phenomena in the universe. In the case of LIGO, you can study the mergers between massive black holes by measuring the laser length deviations smaller than the width of a proton. In the case of our molecule precision measurement, we can learn about beyond standard model new particles and forces that are higher on the energy scale than the highest energy achieved at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
There are underlying reasons why you can study extreme high energy by measuring in extreme high precision. These exotic high energy new particles or forces are interacting with the ordinary particles through the same quantum vacuum fluctuations as mentioned before. The higher energy a particle has, the shorter duration they have when they blink into existence in the fluctuating quantum vacuum, as dictated by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. While they are high on the energy scale, it doesn’t mean that they interact with ordinary matter strongly, in fact the opposite is likely true. Because of that, these short lived fluctuations have very small effects on the ordinary particles and we have to measure very precisely in order to study them.
In the Hutzler lab, we are specifically interested in a type of new particles and forces that can induce asymmetries in the fundamental workings of the universe. Such asymmetries are the reason why we exist and matters exist, instead of all annihilated moments after creation in the big bang. The asymmetries caused the excess creation of matters over anti-matters, and we are the excess matters that remained after most annihilated in pairs. While such asymmetries allow our existence, it is very puzzling and also exciting to learn that the universe has particular preferences. In the void of intergalactic space, it’s natural to assume that there’s no difference between up and down or left and right, yet somehow, for some deep underlying quantum physical process, perturbed by the most extreme exotic particles and forces, the universe does have a preference of one direction over others.
Schematic and plan
The full installation will have two main things on display. One is the cavity where the science is happening, and people will be able to see a bright pillar of light coming in and out of existence. The other is a screen showing a plot, updating in real time, of the brightness of the “pillar of light” and input laser frequency. Such a plot is what we call a spectrum, and it shows at what frequencies can the iodine molecules be excited.
As the schematics shows, we will use a fiber laser as the input into the cavity, with the custom glass iodine vapor cell inserted in the middle of the cavity. With power that is safe for general display, the laser beams will be pretty faint on it’s own, but as the laser frequency drifts into resonance with the iodine molecules in the vapor cell, the iodine molecules in the beam path will start to fluorescence, forming a pillar of light.
In the most ideal scenario, a part of the output from our fiber laser will be sent into a wavemeter that can measure the frequencies of the laser. A computer will combine the frequency information and the brightness information measured by a photodiode (brightness sensor), to plot a spectrum. It will be a live updating plot where the viewer will be able to see the data points going up and down in sync with the brightness of the “pillar of light”.
Such a process will be exactly the same as how we do scanning fluorescence spectroscopy in the lab. We will be able to compare our live updating spectrum with a theory prediction to show how well we understand the quantum behavior of the molecules. Another cool thing we can do is to show how the two iodine nuclei in an iodine molecule are two indistinguishable particles. As a result, many transitions between quantum states are forbidden by symmetries, and from this we can loop in our symmetry discussions for our science storytelling. In practice, we can show the effect by comparing the measured spectrum with two theoretical predictions, one takes quantum statistics into account and the other doesn't.
Limited by budget, there is a possibility that the effect won’t be perfect. After all, in the lab, we are using lasers and wavemeters each costing tens of thousands of dollars, although many defects can be masked if we do things cleverly, and compromise can be made. In the worst case scenario, we can bypass the wavemeter, and instead of having a proper spectrum of brightness vs frequency, it will be a spectrum of brightness vs time. The appearance will be still mostly the same, in fact it might look smoother because we don’t have to deal with frequency noise and instability of the laser and wavemeter reading. There will be a small discount in the science we show, but we will still have plenty of stories to tell.